Analyzing satire
The monument debate has brought an influx of opinions, questions, and attempts to persuade the opposing side. Most arguments use and appeal to logic, emotion, or even compassion, especially regarding the rather "touchy" subject to remove confederate monuments. However, in addition to the formerly mentioned techniques, satire can also be used. In Vulfov's article, he uses satire to mock the entire argument to keep the monuments. Written from the point of view of a doctor who wishes to leave a strong and dangerous tumor growing inside of his patient, the article challenges the entire essence of the argument to not remove the monuments. Throughout the article, the doctor emphasizes that the removal of the tumor would only destroy the patient's medical history. Most notably, though, the doctor questions why anyone would wish to enter the slippery slope of recovery. Such is the basis for Volfor's satire and mocking of Trump and those that wish to keep the statues. With...