The President or First Child: The Case of Donald Trump
Michael Schmidt and Maggie Haberman, in their article “Trump
Humiliated Jeff Sessions After Mueller Appointment” (2017), assert that President
Trump utterly dishonored, demeaned, and degraded his attorney general Jeff
Sessions in a manner that portrays his quick temper unfit for a president. The
authors describe President Trump’s ridicule of Sessions and how he “unleashed a
string of insults” onto Sessions only to leave him on his staff after hearing
advice from his advisors and high staff members, and the subsequent
undercutting of Sessions and his new immigration policy. The authors point to
President Trump’s emotional instability and quick and child-like temper, in
order to prove that he is simply not fit to lead any country, let alone our
country. The authors speak to the American people along with Trump and his
staff, as they seek to inform and incite a feeling of contempt and resent along
with pressuring the White House and the president.
Michael Schmidt and Maggie Haberman’s article points out one
of the most notable flaws in the standing President: his child-like tendencies
and quick temper are unfit to rule the great United States of America. While I
do agree with the thesis and main points of the article, I strongly disagree
with the authors’ prefix “Mr.” given to President Trump. Whether or not one
supports the standing president, he was elected as president of our country
through the normal election process. He is the standing president and deserves
to be given the proper respect and the proper titles. While the authors did
refer to President Trump as “President Trump” in the first paragraph, they then
switched and referred to him as “Mr. Trump.” While his approval ratings may be
astronomically low and he has yet to clearly condemn neo-Nazis and white
supremacists, he is still our president. Other than that one small point, I
completely agree with the ideas and notions hinted to and said in the article. In
addition to verbal communication, another location where Trump likes to display
his child-like mannerisms, is on Twitter at almost any time of day. As a
follower of President Trump, I receive notifications from all of his tweets and
am shocked, bewildered, and amused from many of his tweets on an hourly basis.
What’s even more astonishing about his tweets, is his ability to quickly switch
from tweeting a president like message to minutes later unleashing a string of
insults on a person or company. Take for example the recent hurricanes. This
past week, Trump went to Florida to take in first-hand the destruction brought in
from the brutal Hurricane Irma. Thus, he went to Twitter to share his
motivational and determined goal to recover and regain more strength than ever
before, truly an American message from the man who should stand as a
representation of what this country stands for. However, minutes later,
President Trump, as he did Friday morning will an unleash a Twitter storm on a
person or company. On Friday morning he went after ESPN, referring to Sports Center
host Jemele Hill’s tweets about Trump, where she called him a white
supremacist. President Trump went on to attack ESPN, calling them a dying
company that is losing viewers at an incredible rate. Trump’s raid on ESPN is
so ridiculous, it’s laughable. First off, everybody knows ESPN and frankly all
of TV is dying, it’s not like Trump is telling ESPN they have not known for
years already. And secondly, what does ESPN dying have to do with anything. But,
it gets worse. Just this past weekend Trump retweeted a GIF that shows his golf
ball hitting former first lady Hillary Clinton. An edited GIF, it’s quite
child-like but still did not stop the President from retweeting it. Trump’s
playground bully techniques have grown old and have gone too far. Simply put,
he does not represent the ideal form of America, and he is unfit to sit as the
president of this country. Think about it, what if Obama, Bush, or Clinton bullied
their way through the presidency.
Major problem here: you can't write a RHETORICAL precis about a news article. It has to be an opinion piece. How can you analyze the persuasive technique when there's not persuasion?
ReplyDelete